By Jessica Miller-Merrell
The role of human resources and recruiting are the two most misunderstood
jobs in companies and among today’s workforce. Most employees think we are
simply responsible for hiring and firing, managers believe we are the workplace
police, executives think we are only there for compliance purposes and
candidates see us as phone screeners. There’s so much more to what we do than
people see and the truth is that our jobs are critical to the company.
Our industry has come a long way to prove that we are much
more than, if not at all like, those stereotypes, but even we are to blame for
perpetuating some of these ideas. One way we do this is by using terminology
that others don’t understand or see negatively.
These terms, or HR speak as I like to call it, add to the
assumption that we are just recruiting order takers or HR folks who serve as
the workplace hand-washing referee. This year, I’ll be working on wiping these
five terms from my vocabulary and replacing them with more user-friendly
phrasing. Care to join?
Talent
management
Talent management is really a fancy way of saying we’re
maintaining the hierarchy that’s been in place for years and choosing who will
be next to climb that ladder. It perpetuates an old-school idea that someone
needs to be groomed and that without our constant evaluation and
recommendations, people would never develop into leaders and receive
promotions. It’s stuck up and outdated.
Human
capital
We use this word to talk about the value a person brings to
the organization but it winds up sounding like we view people as assets rather
than human beings. An individual employee’s influence or impact is hard to
measure, but we should speak about them as people, not objects.
Employee
or human relations
Employees often believe that HR departments only advocate
for the organization’s agendas, and it’s sad but these terms conjure up that
image. The truth is, HR professionals support the business and serve as a mediator
between employer and employee, so perhaps new phrasing will reflect that.
Talent
acquisition
The word acquisition sounds like you’re purchasing office
equipment. Attach it to “talent” and you’ve created an image of buying and
trading people. The hiring process is so much softer and more complex than the
word “acquisition” implies.
High
Potential
Often times, our criteria of labeling employees as high
potential is no different than providing one test to hundreds of people and
expecting it to analyze the many nuanced strengths and weaknesses. It’s not
possible because everyone has their own talents and skills. It might help you
with “talent management” (see above) but the reward of someone
receiving this label isn’t worth the dip in morale you’ll experience from
everyone around them.
Jessica Miller-Merrell, SPHR is a workplace and technology strategist specializing in social media. She's the Chief Blogger and Founder of Blogging4Jobs. You can follow her on Twitter at @jmillermerell.